FederalDaily - August 2, 2007
Legislation: Cost Overruns Would Trigger BRAC Reviews
New Jersey’s two senators have introduced legislation that would require reconsideration of
pending base closures when new cost estimates greatly exceed those that were forecast by DoD’s
Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) process. Sens. Robert Menendez (D) and Frank Lautenberg (D) created
the bill in the face of the BRAC closing of New Jersey’s Fort Monmouth, which the senators said
now is expected to cost almost twice the original $780 million BRAC estimate. “The point
of this [BRAC] process was to reduce costs, but now the price tag for some of these base closings is
ballooning out of control,” said Menendez. Lautenberg said the bill, which would provide
a way to review the Ft. Monmouth closing, “would require real accountability and transparency
in the base closure process,” and “ensure that excessive cost overruns in closing a base
like Fort Monmouth never happen again.” The bill would require re-evaluation of any
major base realignment or closure if the actual cost exceeded BRAC’s estimate by more than 25
percent. For more, go to: http://lautenberg.senate.gov/newsroom/record.cfm?id=280081.
:: Back to Top ::
OPM Director Testifies on Pay Issues
Office of Personnel Management (OPM) Director Linda Springer on July 31 testified before a House subcommittee
in support of S. 1046, which would increase pay rates for certain senior-level and senior technical
positions. Springer appeared before the House Subcommittee on the Federal Workforce, Postal Service
and the District of Columbia. The bill, the Senior Professional Performance Act of 2007, also would
revise the Senior Executive Service certification time frame for authorized performance appraisal systems.
Springer also testified in support of legislation that would phase in locality pay for employees working
outside the contiguous 48 states. About 50,000 such employees in these areas now receive cost of living
allowance (COLA) payments rather than locality pay. But those COLAs do not count toward calculation
of retirement annuities. For more, go to: www.opm.gov/news/opm-director-testifies-before-congress-on-federal-pay-issues,1208.aspx.
:: Back to Top ::
DoD Issues New Whistleblower Directive
DoD has issued new rules that offer clearer protections to uniformed and civilian whistleblowers at
the department, according to a DoD directive circulated this week by Public Employees for Environmental
Responsibility (PEER). The July 23, 2007, directive from Deputy Secretary Gordon England lays out a
range of safeguards for department whistleblowers, including punishment for officers or civilian supervisors
who restrain or retaliate against whistleblowers; mandatory investigation of whistleblower complaints
by inspector general (IG) offices within 180 days; and the extension of whistleblower protection regulations
to cover disclosures made within the military chain of command—as well as disclosures made to
IGs or Congress. PEER, which posted the directive on its Web site, said DoD Secretary Robert
Gates “deserves congratulations for taking decisive steps to improve accountability within our
military services,” and for creating protections within DoD at a time when the Department of
Justice is opposing new whistleblower legislation proposed by Congress. To see the directive, go to: http://www.peer.org/docs/dod/07_31_07_dod_directive_military_whistleblower_protection.pdf.
:: Back to Top ::
|