FederalDaily - November 21, 2005
Senate/House Agree on 3.1 Percent Raise
A 3.1 percent pay raise for civilian federal employees has passed a major
hurdle—it has been included in the Transportation and Treasury Appropriations
conference report (the House/Senate agreed-upon version of the bill). The House
passed the report on Nov. 18 and the Senate still has to vote on it. The conference
report also includes outsourcing provisions that state that federal agencies
would now be required to give federal employees a chance to compete for their
jobs through an in-house team known as the Most Efficient Organization. The
language also requires savings of at least 10 percent of what it would cost
the MEO to do the work, or $10 million, before the function can be contracted
out. Maryland Democrats Sens. Barbara A. Mikulski and Paul S. Sarbanes called
the legislation a “major victory” for federal
employees. They said it will help to “level the playing field in [federal
employees’] fight against unfair contracting out procedures.” National
Treasury Employees Union President Colleen Kelley agreed, saying the inclusion
of the outsourcing provision in the conference report was “very good
news.” The same conference report includes language stipulating that
none of the IRS’ Taxpayer Assistance Centers can be shut down—as
proposed—until the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration
completes a study detailing the impact that these closures would have on employees
and clients.
:: Back to Top ::
New Info Posted on Federal Discrimination Complaints
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has posted on its Web site
new information in the form of “frequently asked questions,” about
the administrative hearing process for redress of federal sector discrimination
complaints. The recently posted Web page, at www.eeoc.gov/federal/faq_fshp.html,
is designed to assist complainants without legal representation, EEOC said.
It includes information about the parties involved; steps that take place prior
to, at and after a hearing; definitions of legal terminology; and a variety
of sample forms and orders. “Our administrative judges nationwide are
constantly told by complainants and their representatives that there is a critical
need for information they can understand about how the federal sector hearing
process is conducted,” said Nicholas M. Inzeo, director of the EEOC's
Office of Field Programs.
:: Back to Top ::
Large Increase in Veterans’ COLA
The Senate and the House on Nov. 16 passed one of the largest increases
in the cost of living adjustment (COLA) for veterans in recent memory, the
Senate Committee on Veterans Affairs announced. The bill, S. 1234, sponsored
by Sen. Larry Craig, R-Idaho, committee chairman, now goes to the president
for his signature. “This is the largest increase since 1991,” said
Craig. “For those veterans who are 100 percent disabled, their compensation
will increase by approximately $1,100 for 2006, up from $27,588 to $28,716.”The
increase is based on the rise in the consumer price index. Craig said veterans
will see the increase in their Jan. 1, 2006, paychecks.Among
the veterans estimated to receive such compensation are: 12 World War I veterans;
347,126 World War II veterans; 162,549 Korean-conflict veterans; 944,799 Vietnam-era
veterans; and 639,690 veterans of the Persian Gulf War era.
:: Back to Top ::
Examination of “One Face at the Border”
The House Homeland Security Committee last week approved a provision advanced
by the committee chairman, Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., that calls for an in-depth
study of the impact of the “One Face at the Border” initiative
put in place by the Department of Homeland Security’s Bureau of Customs
and Border Protection (CBP). American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE)
President John Gage and National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU) President
Colleen M. Kelley have expressed opposition to the initiative. One Face at
the Border, which seeks to combine the work of legacy Customs Service, Immigration
and Naturalization Service and Agriculture Department inspectors into a single
position, “has instead resulted in a serious loss of expertise, training
and inspection coverage,” Kelley said. “This loss of specialization
does not make our country safer,” she added. “AFGE was pleased
to see the inclusion of a ‘One Face at the Border’ study in the
underlying majority bill,” Gage said.
:: Back to Top ::
CBP Benefits Rejected
Also while marking up H.R. 4312, the Border Security and Terrorism Prevention
Act of 2005 , the House Homeland Security Committee rejected some provisions
that wouldhave affected CBP employees. According to NTEU,
the provisions—offered by Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, D-Texas—were
efforts to increase journeyman inspectors’ pay grade to GS-12; improve
the existing foreign language award program; provide CBP officers with law
enforcement officer status; and require that trainees at the Federal Law Enforcement
Training Center in Glynco, Georgia, be paid for working a sixth day of training
each week without pay. “Each of these provisions would not only improve
operations at the border,” Kelley said, “they would go a long way
toward addressing the very serious issue of low worker morale within CBP.”
:: Back to Top ::
|