FederalDaily - August 5, 2005
Park Service Attacks Documented
Threats, harassment and attacks against National Park Service (NPS) rangers
and U.S. Park Police officers reached a new record in 2004, according to agency
records released by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER).
NPS commissioned law enforcement officers were victims of assaults 111 times
in 2004. The 2003 total was 106 assaults and the 2002 total was 98. NPS officers
are 12 times more likely to be killed or injured as a result of an assault
than FBI agents, according to PEER. “The National Park Service has an
astoundingly poor safety record for its officers,” stated Randall Kendrick,
executive director for the U.S. Park Rangers Lodge of the Fraternal Order of
Police. “The day-to-day demands of police work on the U.S. Park Police
continue to grow but its resources have not kept pace,” said PEER Executive
Director Jeff Ruch.
:: Back to Top ::
OSC Pursues Employees’ Termination
The National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU) has asked the Merit Systems Protection
Board (MSPB) to protect the jobs of two federal employees. The union asked
MSPB to uphold the April decision of an administrative law judge dismissing
complaints brought against the employees by the Office of Special Counsel (OSC). OSC
is seeking the removal of the two workers, who were charged with violations
of the Hatch Act, which deals with political activity by federal employees.
The employees sent political e-mails to friends while they were at work. OSC
argued that the use of government e-mail to send messages supporting or opposing
political candidates or parties is always impermissible political activity
in the workplace or on duty. NTEU is arguing that an exchange of e-mails within
a small group of co-workers who were personal friends is the equivalent to
a conversation in the workplace.
:: Back to Top ::
NRC Proposes New Fitness-for-Duty Requirements
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is proposing changes to the agency’s
fitness-for-duty requirements for workers who have unescorted access to a nuclear
power plant’s protected areas. The changes include drug- and alcohol-testing
provisions as well as work hour limits to ensure nuclear power plant employees
get enough rest. New requirements would include:
- validity tests for urine samples to determine if a specimen
has been adulterated, diluted or substituted;
- toughening sanctions for drug test violations;
- codifying work hour limits for some workers of no more than
16 hours in a 24-hour period, 26 hours in a 48-hour period
and 72 hours in a week; and
- establishing minimum individual breaks for some workers of
at least 10 hours between shifts, a 24-hour break each week
and a 48-hour break every two weeks.
:: Back to Top ::
TSP Monthly Returns for G, F, C, S and I Funds
Rates of Return were updated on August 1, 2005.
| |
G
Fund |
F
Fund |
C
Fund |
S
Fund |
I
Fund |
| July 2005 |
0.37% |
(0.84%) |
3.67% |
5.59% |
3.07% |
Last 12 months*
(8/01/2004 to 7/31/2005) |
4.39% |
4.85% |
13.99% |
27.14% |
21.09% |
Percentages in ( ) are negative.
* The returns for the G, F, C, S and I funs for the past 12 months,
assuming that, with the exception for the crediting of earnings,
unchanging balances (time-weighting) from month to month and assuming
that earnings are compounded on a monthly basis.
The monthly G, F, C, S, and I Fund returns represent the
actual total rates of return used in the monthly allocation of earnings to
participant accounts. The returns are shown after deduction of accrued TSP
administrative expenses. The F, C, S, and I Fund returns also reflect the deduction
of trading costs and accrued investment management fees. The most current G,
F, C, S, and I Fund rates of return are shown above. Returns are updated after
the monthly allocation of earnings, usually by the fourth business day of the
month.
To learn more about TSP, click
here.
:: Back to Top ::
|