Federal Employees News Digest
» Subscriber Sign In
» To Subscribe
» Sample Issue
» Trial Subscription
 

Welcome to FederalDaily.com
Federal Daily
FREE! Stay up-to-date on important changes to your federal career

SIGN UP NOW


     
Banner02
Federal Soup

Survivor Benefits Denied

By Elizabeth Saloom, July 24, 2003

In an update of a case previously discussed in a Federal Families column, Lynne Stockberger, the widow of a federal employee, was denied her appeal last month for survivor benefits. The previous dismissal of her case was affirmed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.

When a federal employee dies, his or her dependents can file for survivor benefits. Last year,  Stockberger went a step further when she filed a negligence suit against her late husband's employer, the Bureau of Prisons in Terre Haute, Ind.

In March 1999, her husband, Maurice Stockberger, a U.S. Penitentiary employee, insisted on leaving work early. He was an insulin dependent diabetic and told co-workers he was not feeling well, apparently suffering from a hypoglycemic episode. While driving his pick-up truck, he swung off and back onto the road, knocked down traffic signs, and hit a tree. The truck burst into flames when he hit the tree and he died from the crash.

Previously, sick or injured BOP employees, including Stockberger, were given rides home or to medical facilities by other prison employees. Stockberger's widow argued that these past instances of aid created the assumption of a duty to aid ailing employees. However, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Terre Haute Division, found these actions were not official policy.

Many of Maurice Stockberger's co-workers had medical backgrounds and were able to recognize his hypoglycemic symptoms. At least eight coworkers knew he was sick that day. One gave him a can of Ensure to drink, another suggested that he eat something for his low sugar level and a third asked him to stay a while before leaving work.

Lynne Stockberger's negligence claims alleged the government failed to provide her husband adequate medical care and allowed him to leave and drive a motor vehicle alone while he was incapable of doing so.

However, the appeals court found the agency was not responsible for Stockberger's diabetes, medical care or transportation. BOP was not negligent because the employee had rejected his co-workers' offers of help, and left the building under his own power.


More Federal Families stories
Related Products
Federal Employees Almanac
Getting Out of Debt and the New Bankruptcy Law
Your Thrift Savings Plan
Life Insurance Guide for Federal Employees
Related Links
Federal Employee Education & Assistance Fund
FederalNewsRadio.com
Telecommuting
 

Home | Subscriber Sign In | Catalog | Financial Planning & Retirement | Jobs & Careers | Labor & Management | Pay & Benefits | Policies & Practices | U.S. Postal Service
Financial Planners | Legal Services | Federal Families | Events & Conferences | Our Marketplace | Advertise With Us | Invite A Friend | About Us | Contact Us
 

Copyright © 2008 by 1105 Media, Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without expressed written permission
by 1105 Media, Inc. is prohibited.

Privacy Policy