Workforce Wonk

By Alyah Khan

Blog archive

Obama explains the pay freeze

At the White House's first-ever Twitter Town Hall held July 6, President Barack Obama took just one question related to public employees. But the answer he gave answered another question that's been on many people's minds.

The question came from a participant named Patrick, who tweeted the following to Obama: “Mr. President, in several states we have seen people lose their collective bargaining rights. Do you have a plan to rectify this?”

Obama noted that collective bargaining rights are important, but the rest of his response was murky. Then he brought up the two-year pay freeze his administration imposed on the federal workforce.

“Now that wasn’t real popular, as you might imagine, among federal workers,” Obama said, according to the official White House transcript of the event. “We were able to do that precisely because we wanted to prevent layoffs, and we wanted to make sure that we sent a signal that everybody is going to have to make some sacrifices, including federal workers.”

The comment stood out because, in recent months, Republican lawmakers have been calling for cuts to the size of the federal workforce to lower the nation’s deficit. 

Several bills have been introduced to shrink the federal workforce through attrition, but none has gained significant momentum.

However, in a time of constrained budgets, is it worth considering targeted reductions in the federal workforce rather than across-the-board cuts?

Some who would answer yes to that question have said that before the government attempts to carry out any kind of downsizing effort, administration officials must first decide what services or programs the government would no longer provide as a result of having a smaller workforce.

Posted by Alyah Khan on Jul 07, 2011 at 1:11 PM




 

Reader comments

Wed, Aug 3, 2011

Dems keep telling us how Bill Clinton balanced the budget and created a surplus. However, don't mention it was a Republican congress that passed those budgets. However, having said that --- if the budget under Bill Clinton was so good then I say lets implement the budget as it was in 1996. Maybe we can balance it again.

Wed, Aug 3, 2011

While I agree that the Democrats were in the House and Senate while George W. Bush was Presidnet, they did what the President asked. They like lots of people wanted to defend our Country against terrorists. At that time Congress wanted and so did the American people to eliminate the person(s) responsible for 9/11. When George W. Bush took office there WAS a balanced budget or at least a surplus. Did we really need a new Cabinet position? Are law enforcement agencies communicating now where they did not before Dept of Homeland Security was established? We also learned in the Reagan Administration that when you start out at the higher levels money does not trickle down. Water and crap are the only things that trickle down.

Tue, Aug 2, 2011 Federal Employee

I say that it was Bush's fault that we are in this situation, he had wanted this war before Obama became president. No one looks at that. Some of the peole say that it is all Obama's doing's what is happening now. How I look at it he has been trying to get us out of the RED and make things right, but not some of you. Maybe some of you don't like Obama but so far I see him as some one that trying to get us out of the hole. no one is even trying to see what he is doing. Bush is the one that got us in the hole and started the war not Obama.

Mon, Jul 18, 2011

Well, I accept the "pay freeze" only if our President and Congress will do the same. 'Nuf said!

Thu, Jul 14, 2011 22 Year Fed

I wasn't keen on the 2-year freeze, but accepted it as a sacrifice for my country. Unfortunately, it did NOT prevent layoffs as our office (along with 4 others) were RIF-ed by our DoD agency. I was happy to believe I had made it through to the end (so-called) of the recession, but then saddened that Congress had chosen to fall in lock-step with uninformed public about the evils of Civil Servants. I feel a little betrayed at being booted after 22 years of loyalty and hard-work to one agency, but I will land on my feet. Alas, if the lawmakers don't champion us as they have done in the past, the outlook for civilians, who want to serve there country, will only worsen.

Show All Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above